John French Sloan

McSorley’s Bar, 1912, Oil on Canvas, 66.04 x 81.28cm, Detroit Institute of the Arts

We know a lot about John French Sloan. He was one of the famous “Eight” who made up the Ashcan School in the early Twentieth Century. The Ashcan School supposedly offered us all a realistic look at New York City’s grimy underbelly, but this was a sensibility more honored in the breach than most. As usual, reality and hype do not dance together, and in fact are each listening to different orchestras at once. Most of the Ashcan School paintings I’ve seen are rather pretty. So much for grime.

Easter Eve, 1907, Oil on Canvas, 81.28 x 66.04cm, Private Collection

 

Sloan’s successes were more hard-won than most. He never rang the bell of artistic greatness that so many others did. He often had to compromise his work to make a living, struggling along as an illustrator here, a cartoonist there. He was known to have a bitter and sharp way with words. In later years he would teach artists like Alexander Calder who would enjoy far greater commercial rewards than anything of which Sloan could have ever dreamt. He often warned his students they could learn nothing from him of making a living.

I love his art, and I think McSorley’s Bar is one of the great American paintings. But I am more intrigued by Sloan himself. He was a complicated and oddly gentle man. He was apparently a bit of a naif when it came to courting and the ways of romance, and when he did fall in love he chose a prostitute named Anna Maria Wall, known as “Dolly.” He had no illusions about her; they had met in the brothel. But he loved her and married her and did not care a fig for anyone else’s opinion. She was also an alcoholic, and everyone knew that as well, and he did not care a fig for anyone’s opinion about that either. Just to round things off, Dolly was also a little bit mad. Figs be damned!

Even for an artist, this was extraordinary. For her part, Dolly adored him.

Dolly did not get better, but Sloan fought harder to help her. At her doctor’s suggestion, Sloan began to keep a very special kind of diary in which he recorded not only his daily activities and work, but the many ways in which Dolly made his life better. It was a secret diary supposedly, but one he meant for her to discover, one purposely used to salt the dark mine of Dolly’s fragile self esteem. He did this patiently, religiously, from 1906 until 1913. This diary was published in the sixties and apparently provides a wonderful look into the art world and habits of that time. I will make it my business to find it and read it.

As a gift of love it must surely be without parallel.

Renganeschi’s Saturday Night, 1912, Oil on Canvas, 66.68 x 66.04cm, Art Institute of Chicago

He loved the city, too. Just as he left Dolly secrets to discover on her own, he laid out bits of urban bliss to cheer our hearts and warm our souls. He has told us that he sought only to paint the things he saw. He did not set out to say anything political or profound. He watched people secretly—refusing to disturb their realities with his needs for composition and art, which he believed were intrusions on the world. As someone who has fallen in love with New York City over and over again, I have to admit that I can feel that great urban engine just gazing at these works. It is a fabulous city filled with fabulous people.

I’ll see you there, this spring, in the park, in the rain.

Spring Rain, 1912, Oil on Canvas, 20.25 x 26 inches, Delaware Art Museum

This entry was posted in Fine Art, The Automat and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to John French Sloan

  1. I remember the Ashcan School in art history, although this particular artist doesn’t ring a bell. Spring Rain is beautiful. And, speaking of grime I have a question for you. I’m reading the Weimar Culture by Peter Gay and wanted to know what American artists come to your mind during 1918 – 1933. I thought it would be neat to look at what the US and Germany were doing in regards to art and culture. How different, similar etc.

    • foxpudding says:

      Well, I think they were very different for that period in that the Americans were still very much tied to regionalist and representational art more firmly than the Germans. Further, the influence of WWI on the German artists was enormous. Artists like Otto Dix and Kathe Kollwitz (https://foxpudding.wordpress.com/2011/01/20/kathe-kollwitz/) were forever changed by the war. Meanwhile here were the Hoppers, the Thomas Hart Bentons, the Grant Woods, the various regional schools. There is the somewhat dubious claim of an artist named Manierre Dawson who believed himself to be first in the world with a true abstract, but if so he certainly never influenced anyone so Kandinsky (Russian but in Germany during the Weimar) can rest easy. Then came the Depression here which also complicated our art picture as so many of our artists went to work for the government. Likewise, the rise of Naziism wreaked havoc in the German art world, and some truly sad stories come out of that. Check out the career arc for Emil Nolde to see what happens to an artist who betrays his own ideals. Anyway, when I write a book on this subject I’ll try to devote a hundred pages or so to answering your question. Cool.

  2. Maybe it’s because I’m riding an endorphin wave having seen the Shuttle fly over — but these paintings look vital and fresh and beautiful to me. Magical J: you might be interested in this – “A Transatlantic Avant-Garde: American Artists in Paris, 1918-1939” by Christian Derouet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s